我国环境侵权因果关系的证明责任  

On the Distribution of Burden of Proof on Causation in Environmental Torts of China

作　　者：童光法[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京农学院文法学院,北京102206

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第4期29-36,共8页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：北京市教委人文社会科学重点项目(SZ201510020012);北京新农村建设研究基地项目(PXM2015014207000013)

摘　　要：我国《侵权责任法》第66条规定的环境侵权因果关系是举证责任倒置还是因果关系推定,目前存在不同看法。举证责任倒置倡导者是从字面解释等角度去分析,认为环境侵权因果关系完全倒置于加害方;因果关系推定的主张者则从立法政策等方面论证,认为受害人仍需要承担基础事实的举证责任。环境侵权因果关系证明责任分配需要平衡受害人与加害方之间的利益,本着受害人权益保护与加害人一定的行为自由一体考量的价值目标,科学配置他们之间的证明责任规范。There are different views on causation in environmental torts of China. According to ar- ticle 66 of Tort Law, it should be inversion of burden of proof or causation presumption. To advocate the former, the burden of proof should be shifted from victims to polluters completely through the lit- eral meaning of the article; whereas the advocate of causation presumption thinks the victims should take the burden of evidence of basic facts by considering the legal policy. To distribute the burden of proof on causation in environmental torts scientifically, we need consider the value and goal of Tort Law and balance the different benefits of victims and polluters.

关 键 词：环境侵权 因果关系推定 举证责任倒置 证明责任 

分 类 号：D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]