检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈雪珍[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学,广东广州510275
出 处:《政法学刊》2014年第6期23-30,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law
摘 要:在宪法与其他法律明确规定,相关文件高度强调人民法院独立行使审判权的同时,实践中却呈现出另一番局面。司法行政化和司法地方化的现象依然严重,审判者面临来自其他机关、上级法院、本院领导等多方面因素的影响。审判权独立的核心要义在于确保审理者裁判和裁判者负责。本文在厘清审判权独立基本内涵的基础上,对实践中影响审判权独立的因素进行分析,并针对如何保障审理者裁判和裁判者负责的问题提出自己的见解。The Constitution and other relevant laws clearly prescribe and related documents highly stress that people's courts exercise judicial power independently,while in practice the situation presents another look. The phenomenon of administrative tendency and localization of judicature is still serious. The judges are influenced by many factors,including other organs,superior court,the court leaders,etc. The core essence of jurisdiction independence lies in its enabling the adjudicator to judge and judges to take responsibility. On the basis of clarifying the basic connotation of jurisdiction independence,this paper analyses the factors that influence jurisdiction independence and put forward proposals on how to guarantee the principle of " let adjudicator judge and judges take responsibility".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15