农业补贴对农户农业生产行为的影响分析——来自湖北农村的实证  

Impact of Agricultural Subsidy on Farmers' Production Behavior——The Evidence from Rural Areas of Hubei Province

作　　者：吴海涛[1] 霍增辉[2] 臧凯波[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学工商管理学院,湖北武汉430073 [2]中国计量大学经济管理学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《华中农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第5期25-31,共7页Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目"生命周期;生计策略与农户贫困动态性"(71273281);国家自然科学基金项目"山区农户生计转型及其脆弱性研究"(71003106);中南财经政法大学优秀研究生论文培育项目(2014YS0802)

摘　　要：从理论上推论了农业补贴对农户耕地利用行为、资本投入行为和劳动力配置行为的影响,然后利用2006-2010年湖北省农村住户调查面板数据实证检验了农业补贴对农户农业生产行为的影响效应。结果表明:粮食直补、良种补贴和农资综合补贴对农户粮食作物生产均产生了显著地正向激励作用,粮食播种面积的扩大增加了农户生产资料和生产性服务的支出;然而,这3种补贴方式对农户生产激励的效果存在区别,生产性补贴的效果要大于收入性补贴;农机具购置补贴对农户农作物播种和粮食播种面积几乎没有影响;由于大型农机具服务的供给增加,导致了农户生产性服务支出的增加。为此,政府应加大对农户的生产性补贴力度,并设计出农业生产性服务补贴。This paper firstly analyses the impact of agricultural subsidy on farmer＇s behavior of land use,capital input and labor location.Then this paper estimates the effect of agricultural subsidy on farmer＇s production behavior using rural household panel data from 2006 to 2010in Hubei province.The result shows that three kinds of subsidies including grain subsidy,seed subsidy and capital goods subsidies have positive effect on grain production,and the expansion of grain area causes more expenses on capital goods and production service.However,these three kinds of subsidies have different effects on farmers＇ production behavior.The effect of production subsidy is bigger than that of income subsidy.There is no effect of agricultural machinery subsidy on crop area and grain area.Meanwhile,due to the increase of large agricultural machinery service supply,production service expenses of farmers are increasing.Thus,government should increase the production subsidy and design agricultural production service subsidy.

关 键 词：农业补贴 耕地利用 资本投入 劳动力配置 

分 类 号：F301[经济管理—产业经济]