“合同履行费用过高”适用研究  

Query and Criticism to the High Cost of Performing the Contract

作　　者：邓达江[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《怀化学院学报》2015年第7期46-50,共5页Journal of Huaihua University

基　　金：西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划"嬗变与发展:强制履行与效率违约之关系研究"(XZYJS2014220)

摘　　要：《合同法》第110条第2项中关于合同履行费用过高的规定存在先天性缺陷。在决定合同是否强制履行时,除了考虑合同的履行费用是否过高外,还应斟酌违约人是否存在故意、合同是否载有特殊目的等因素。实际上,当存在违约人故意、合同载有特殊目的和履行尚属可能等要件时,应考虑适用合同的强制履行。因而,以合同的履行费用过高为中心,以违约人故意、合同特殊目的为路径,结合学界理论与司法实践,对合同履行费用过高之规定进行理论审思与制度甄别,以期对理论和实践能有所助益。It has congenital defects of Article 110（ 2） of contract law of the People＇s Republic of China,which stipulates the breaching party can refuse to perform if the performance of the contract costs too much. When deciding whether to enforce the contract or not,we should not only consider whether the cost is too high for the implementation of the contract,but also consider whether there is the intentional default and the special purpose of the contract,and so on. Actually,when there is a breach of contract,the contract deliberately carrying special purpose and the performance is possible, and other elements, we should consider the enforcement of the contract. Therefore,based on the high cost as the center,with the default intentionally and special purpose as the path,and combining with academic theory and judicial practice,we should reflect and screen the high cost,hoping it may do some good to the theory and practice.

关 键 词：履行费用过高 合同特殊目的 强制实际履行 违约人之故意 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]