检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报)》2015年第4期62-71,共10页INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
基 金:对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助课题(13YBJJX02)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:随着主权财富基金的不断发展,各界对其透明度的关注度不断上升。中投公司作为新兴市场国家政府背景主权财富基金的重要代表,其透明度选择尤为引人注目。本文选择了常用的三种主权财富基金评估体系,通过与新加坡、韩国主权财富基金对比分析、补充分值及增设打分档位等方法,对中投公司近年来的透明度进行持续评估,力图客观分析中投公司透明度的动态改进,并提出有针对性的改进建议。With Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) continuously developing, the issue of its transparency begins to attract rising attention of all circles. China Investment Corporation (CIC), as a significant representative of government- based SWF of emerging market countries, is more highlighted in terms of its transparency setting. This paper chooses the commonly- used three SWF evaluation systems, by adopting the methods of comparative analysis with SWF of Singapore and Korea, supplementary score and add- grade gear, to conduct the consecutive evaluation of the transparency of CIC in recent years. The dynamic improvement of CIC' s transparency is reviewed and reasonable suggestions for transparency improvement are proposed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31