检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省青岛市市立医院东院区呼吸内科,266071
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2015年第20期137-138,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的比较两种时机应用氧气驱动雾化吸入在无创正压通气治疗COPD患者中的疗效。方法收集2014年5~12月入住我院呼吸科的慢性阻塞性肺疾病Ⅲ级患者40例:随机分为观察组A(23人)和对照组B(17人)。A组患者在使用无创正压通气治疗的同时氧气雾化吸入药液,B组患者在无创正压通气治疗间歇期间给予氧气雾化吸入药液,观察两组患者疗效、用药依从性。结果与B组相比,A组患者临床疗效、用药依从性均明显提高,P〈0.05。结论氧气雾化吸入同时联合无创正压通气的雾化方式有显著疗效。Objective To compare the effect of two kinds of application of oxygen driven atomization inhalation in the treatment of COPD with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). Methods 40 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease grade III admitted to the Department of respiration were chosen in our hospital from May,2014 to December, the patients were randomly divided into observation group A (23 persons) and control group B (17 persons). Group A used oxygen atomizing inhalation combined with NPPV at the same time, group B conventional application of oxygen atomizing inhalation in the interval of NPPV. To observe the efficacy, Patient compliance, drug distribution depth of two groups. Results Compared with the group B, the clinical efficacy, patient compliance, drug distribution depth were significantly improved in the group A, P〈0.05. Conclusion Oxygen atomizing inhalation combined with NPPV at the same time has a significant effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63