检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王春革[1] 徐彦贵[1] 王屏[1] 任海霞[1] 高笑舸[1] 魏晓晨[1] 朱立勤[1]
出 处:《中国医院药学杂志》2015年第14期1298-1302,共5页Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
基 金:"十二五"国家科技支撑计划课题(编号:2013BAI06B04)
摘 要:目的:利用决策树模型评价万古霉素和利奈唑胺治疗皮肤软组织感染的成本-效果。方法:选取公开发表的万古霉素与利奈唑胺治疗皮肤软组织感染的临床对照研究,以临床可评估患者随访结束后的临床治愈率为效果指标,以决策树模型进行成本-效果分析。结果:万古霉素和利奈唑胺的治愈率分别为93%和94%,直接成本分别为7 596.96元和10 091.20元,增量成本为249 424.00元。结论:万古霉素治疗皮肤软组织感染的成本-效果优于利奈唑胺。OBJECTIVE To evaluate cost-effect of vancomycin vs.linezolid in treatment of skin and soft tissue infections induced by drug resistant Gram-positive bacteria using a decision analytic(DA)model.METHODS Probabilities were determined from published randomized controlled trials.Clinical cure rate of evaluable patients at end-of-treatment visit was used as effect of indicators.A decision analytic model was created to evaluate the cost-effectiveness.RESULTS Clinical cure rates of vancomycin and linezolid were 93%and94%.Costs of vancomycin and linezolid were 7 596.96 and10 091.20 yuan.ICER was249 424.00 yuan.CONCLUSION Cost-effect of vancomycin is better than linezolid in treatment of skin and soft tissue infections induced by drug resistant Gram-positive bacteria.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.131.110