检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河海大学,江苏省南京市211100 [2]江苏开放大学
出 处:《职业与健康》2015年第13期1821-1825,1832,共6页Occupation and Health
基 金:江苏省教育科学"十二五"规划课题(项目编号:D/2011/02/331);河海大学2014学生工作研究会课题
摘 要:目的探讨家庭环境、神经质、孤独感和大学生心理健康状况之间的关系。方法采用家庭环境量表(FES)、艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)、孤独量表(UCLA)、大学生人格问卷(UPI)对3045名大学生进行问卷调查。用SPSS 19.0进行数据分析。结果 1积极的家庭环境因子预示着个体较好的心理健康状况(r=-0.343,-0.324,-0.376,-0.325均P<0.01),消极的家庭环境因子预示着个体较差的心理健康状况(r=0.336;P<0.01)。2神经质在家庭环境与孤独感之间的关系中起中介作用,孤独感在神经质与大学生的心理健康状况之间的关系中起中介作用。3家庭环境可以通过神经质-孤独感中介链对大学生的心理健康状况产生间接效应。结论家庭环境不仅可以直接对大学生的心理健康状况产生影响,还通过神经质-孤独感中介链间接影响大学生的心理健康状况。[ Objective] To explore the relationship among family environment, neurotieism, loneliness and mental health in college students.[Methods] Family environment scale (FES), Eysenek personality questionnaire (EPQ), Loneliness scale (UCLA) and University personality inventory (UPI) were administered to 3 045 college students. SPSS 19.0 was used to analyze the data. [Results] ①Positive family environment factors indicated better mental health status (r=-0.343,-0.324, -0.376, -0.325, all P〈0.01), while negative family environment factors indicates poorer mental health status (r=0.336, P〈0.01). ②Neurotieism had mediating effect in relationship between family environment and loneliness, and loneliness had mediating effect in relationship between neuroticism and mental health in college students. ③Family environment has an indirect effect on college students' mental health by the neuroticism-loneliness mediating chain. [ Conclusion] Family environment not only has a direct role on the college students' mental health, but also indirectly influences it through neuroticism-loneliness mediating chain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15