检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《岭南急诊医学杂志》2015年第3期178-179,183,共3页Lingnan Journal of Emergency Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者接受心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2008年1月至2013年12月我科收治的46例CHF患者需要置入CRT的临床资料,比较CRT置入术前和术后6个月的心功能分级(NYHA)、左室射血分数(LVEF),左室舒张内径((LVED)、心电图QRS波群时限、6 min步行距离。结果:患者根据新器械置入和原有起搏器升级分为新置入组(A组,n=23)和起搏器升级组(B组,n=23),A、B组CRT后反应良好率分别为69.6%(16/23)和73.9%(17/23),无明显差异(P>0.05);与治疗前相比,两组的NYHA、LVEF均有明显改善,LVED明显缩小、QRS时限明显缩短,6 min步行距离显著提高,P均<0.05。结论:CRT能改善药物治疗不满意的CHF患者的心功能不全症状。Objective :To observe the clinical effect of patients with chronic heart failure(CHF)treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT). Methods : The clinical data of 46 patients with CHF treated by CRT were analyzed retrospectively from Jan 2008 to Dec 2013. The cardiac function(NYHA), LVEF,LVED,QRS duration,6- minute hall walk distances were compared before and after CRT implantation 6 months. Results : The cases were classified as new implants group(group A,n =23) and upgradings group(group B,n =23) according to the new implants. The effectiveness of CRT were no significant different between the group A and group B [69.6%(16 / 23) vs 73.9%(17 /23),P〈0.05 ]. Compared with the before treatment,the NYHA、LVEF were significant improvement, the LVED 、QRS duration significantly decreased and the 6-minute hall wall distances significantly improved,all P〈0.05. Conclusion :CRT can obviously improve the symptoms of cardiac dysfunction of patients with CHF.
分 类 号:R541.6[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.254