检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《岭南急诊医学杂志》2015年第3期191-192,195,共3页Lingnan Journal of Emergency Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨年龄校正的D-二聚体(D-dimer)结合临床风险评估在老年人急性肺栓塞(PTE)的诊断中的临床应用价值。方法:对疑患PTE的老年患者(≥60岁)进行修正的Geneva评分,根据评分结果分为低风险组及高风险组;D-二聚体分别使用传统临界值(500 ug/L)及年龄校正临界值[(年龄×10)ug/L]对诊断PTE的特异性及敏感性进行比较。结果:在356例患者中,191例为低风险组,165例为高风险组。在诊断PTE的特异性上,D-二聚体年龄校正临界值显著优于传统临界值(低风险组:41.0%vs 23.4%,高风险组:76.3%vs 55.9%,P<0.05),而在诊断PTE的敏感性上,两组无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:年龄校正的D-二聚体临界值结合修正的Geneva评分可提高老年患者诊断PTE的特异性。Objective :To explore the value of age-adjusted D-dimer combined with clinical probability to confirm or exclude acute pulmonary thromboembolism(PTE) in elderly patients..Method :.Elderly patients(≥60 years)suspected with PTE were evaluated by the revised Geneva score,which divide into low-risk group and high-risk group.Conventional cut-off value was 500 ug / L,while age-adjusted cut-off value was set as patient's age ×10 ug / L..The sensitivity and specificity using the 2 cut-off values in confirming or excluding the diagnoses of PTE were compared.Results:The study consisted of 356 cases,using the revised Geneva score model,191 cases were scored as low-risk group,and 165 cases as high-risk group.The age-adjusted cut-off value of D-dimer was significantly better than conventional cut-off value in diagnosing specificity of PTE(low-risk group : 41.0% vs 23.4%,high-risk group :76.3%vs 55.9%,P〈0.05)and they were no significant difference in diagnosing sensitivity of PTE(P〈0.05). Conclusion :The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off value combined with the revised Geneva score may increase diagnosing specificity of PTE in elderly patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117