检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:饶广浩[1] 徐招柱[1] 谢锋[1] 王东晓[1]
出 处:《岭南急诊医学杂志》2015年第3期202-203,共2页Lingnan Journal of Emergency Medicine
基 金:广东省梅州市医药卫生科研课题(2014-B-61)
摘 要:目的:探讨急诊医生运用床边FAST B超检查在急诊危重病中的诊治优势。方法:将我科2010年1月-2014年12月诊治的急危重病患者80例分为研究组(n=42)和对照组(n=38),研究组由急诊医生运用床边FAST B超检查,对照组由超声医生按床边传统B超法检查,比较两组检查方法的正确率和患者来院到B超检查完成的时间。结果:与对照组相比,研究组可明显缩短来院到B超检查完成的时间(P<0.01),两组B超检查的正确率无明显差异,均为100%。结论:急诊医生运用床旁FAST B超法检查,能在急诊危重病的诊治中缩短来院到B超检查完成的时间,为急诊危重病者赢取宝贵的抢救时间。Objective :To explore the advantages of bedside FAST B ultrasound diagnosis in critically patients used by emergency physicians. Methods :80 patients with acute and critically ill were divided into research group(n=42) and control group(n =38) from Jan 2010 to Dec 2014. The B ultrasound examination were examined by emergency physicians using bedside FAST B ultrasound in the research group,while B ultrasound examination were examined by ultrasound doctor at bedside in the control group according to the traditional ultrasound inspection method. The diagnosis accuracy rate and the time from patient arrived at the hospital to completed the ultrasound examination were compared between the two groups. Results :Compared with the control group,the time from patient arrived at the hospital to completed the ultrasound examination was significantly shorter in the research group than that in the control group(P〈0.01),but the diagnosis accuracy rate was no significant different,both were 100%.Conclusion :It can short the time from patient arrived at the hospital to completed the ultrasound examination and win the precious rescue time to patients with emergency critically ill to use bedside FAST B ultrasound examination by emergency physicians.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28