检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《西部医学》2015年第8期1248-1249,1252,共3页Medical Journal of West China
摘 要:目的评估医护合作干预模式对中重度烧伤成人患者负性情绪的效果。方法将我科收治的74例成人中重度烧伤患者,按入院顺序随机分为对照组、观察组各37例。观察组患者采用医护合作干预模式,对照组采用常规护理,比较两组患者的焦虑、抑郁改善情况,并将患者的治疗依从性和治疗满意度进行统计比较。结果两组患者经过综合干预后,患者焦虑和抑郁情况评分均随着住院时间的推移均呈下降趋势,但观察组患者焦虑、抑郁情况评分在入院第15日和出院时均明显优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者的治疗满意率和对治疗的依从性均明显好于对照组(P<0.05)。结论医护合作干预可有效缓解成人中重度烧伤患者的负性情绪,有效提高患者治疗依从性和治疗满意度,促进了医患关系的和谐。Objective To explore and evaluate the intervention effect of medical cooperation on negative emotion of adult patients with moderate to severe burn. Methods 74 adult patients with severe burn patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 37 cases in each group. The observation group was treated by medical cooperation intervention model and the control group received routine nursing care. The anxiety, depression, compliance and satisfaction degree of patients were compared. Results Two groups of patients after comprehensive intervention, The anxiety and depression scores of the patients after comprehensive intervention decreased. The anxiety and depression scores of observation group at admission and at discharge fifteenth days were significantly better than that of the control group (P〈0. 05). The treatment satisfaction rate and compliance of the observation group were significantly better than that of the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion The medical cooperation intervention can effectively alleviate the severe nega- tive emotions in adult burn patients, improve patient compliance and satisfaction with treatment, and promote the harmo- nious relationship between doctors and patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15