论涉外知识产权案件“被请求保护地”的认定  

On the Determination of the Place where Protection is Claims in Foreign-Related Intellectual Property Case

作　　者：孙妍妍[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学滨海学院,天津300071

出　　处：《时代法学》2015年第4期100-104,共5页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：2010年教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"中国国际私法实证研究"(项目批准号:10YJA820082;项目负责人:南开大学秦瑞亭);天津市科技计划项目"我市产业技术创新联盟的激励机制和政策研究"(项目编号:14ZLZLZF00006;项目负责人:王斌)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法》第50条关于涉外知识产权侵权纠纷法律适用中的"被请求保护地"与"法院地"是两个不同的概念范畴。通过两个案例不难发现,我国不少法院在审理涉外知识产权案件时,尚不能做到对冲突规范和法律适用加以认真分析、充分说理,对一些重要的国际私法问题视而不见,直接导致了实体判决结果上的错误。这种错误判决无论在中级人民法院还是高级人民法院都存在。其中一个主要原因是我国对"被请求保护地"的司法解释处于缺失状态,现有的法律也没有明确告诉法官当存在多个"请求保护地"时应如何应对。＂ The Laws at The Locality where Claimed Protection＂ and ＂the laws at the locality of the court＂ in the article 50 of＂ The People＇s Republic of China Foreign-related Civil Relations Law Applicable Law＂ are totally different generations. Through two cases, we can find that when many Chinese courts hear intellectual property cases concerning foreign affairs, there were no serious anal- ysis or full reasoning on the conflict rules and application of law, and they are blind to some impor- tant problems in private international law, which will cause the wrong entity judgement. Such wrong judgement exsits in the intermediate people＇s court and higher people＇s court. The lack of judicial in- terpretation on ＂the locality where claimed protection＂ is the one of the primary cause. Moreover, according to the current laws, the judges don＇t know how to deal with the state of more than two lo- calities where claimed protection exsiting at the same time.

关 键 词：涉外民事关系法律适用法 被请求保护地 知识产权 

分 类 号：DF971[政治法律—国际法学]