胸腔穿刺置管闭式引流与反复胸腔穿刺抽液治疗结核性胸膜炎的临床效果  

Clinical effect of pleural puncture closed drainage and repeated pleural puncture drainage in treatment of tuberculous pleurisy

作　　者：戚代江 

机构地区：[1]重庆市长寿区人民医院,重庆401220

出　　处：《世界最新医学信息文摘》2015年第32期24-24,22,共2页World Latest Medicine Information Electronic Version

摘　　要：目的比较分析胸腔穿刺置管闭式引流与反复胸腔穿刺抽液治疗结核性胸膜炎的临床效果。方法回顾性分析本院2012年12月至2014年12月收治的63例结核性胸膜炎患者的临床资料,按照治疗方法分为对照组(31例)和观察组(32例),分别给予反复胸腔穿刺抽液治疗和胸腔穿刺置管闭式引流治疗。观察两组的治疗效果,并进行比较。结果观察组的治疗总有效率为93.75%,显著高于对照组的80.65%,P<0.05。结论临床对结核性胸膜炎患者进行治疗的时候,较之反复胸腔穿刺抽液治疗,胸腔穿刺置管闭式引流治疗可以获得更好的临床效果。ABSTRACT：Objective： compare and analyze clinical effect of pleural puncture closed drainage and repeated pleural puncture drainage in treatment of tuberculous pleurisy. Method：review and analyze 63 cases tuberculosis pleurisy patients with clinical data received in our hospital during December 2012 and December 2014, and divide them into control group （31 cases） and observation group （32 cases） according to treatment methods. Apply repeated pleural puncture drainage and pleural puncture closed drainage treatment respectively. And observe clinical effect of both groups. Result：total effective rate of observation group is 93.75%, which is signiifcantly higher than 80.65%of control group, P〈0.05. Conclusion：clinical effects of pleural puncture closed drainage treating tuberculosis pleurisy is much better than repeated pleural puncture drainage.

关 键 词：结核性胸膜炎 胸腔穿刺 置管 闭式引流 

分 类 号：R561[医药卫生—呼吸系统]