检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈婕[1] 陆超[1] 李涓[1] 李享[1] 赖祯宏 梁繁荣[1]
机构地区:[1]成都中医药大学,成都610037
出 处:《中华中医药杂志》2015年第8期3011-3013,共3页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基 金:国家重点基础研究计划(973计划)(No.2012CB518501);四川省科技厅项目(No.2011SZ0302)~~
摘 要:目的:了解近10年针刺治疗原发性高血压病的临床随机对照研究文献的质量情况,为提高相关研究的质量提供方向。方法:以"针刺""高血压"等为检索词,计算机检索中英文数据库,手工检索中医杂志及有关学术会议论文汇编。对纳入文献的方法学、诊断及纳入、排除标准、干预措施、疗效评价等方面进行评价。结果:共纳入31篇随机对照研究文献,其中4篇为高质量研究,27篇为低质量研究。结论:目前有关针刺治疗原发性高血压病的临床研究报道质量偏低,尚不足以为针刺治疗原发性高血压病的有效性提供可靠依据。Objective: To evaluate the qualities of acupuncture randomized controlled trails (RCTs) for essential hypertension (EH) published in recent ten years, so as to provide a direction for improving qualities of related research. Methods: The author searched the RCTs from databases in both Chinese and English via computer retrieval system and also conducted a hand-made retrieval from journals of Chinese medicine, and collections of these of the related academic conferences. The key words used were: ‘acupuncture', ‘essential hypertension' and so on. Then, the author made a systemic evaluation on the original articles from methodology, diagnosis, inclusion and exclusion criteria, intervention methods, outcome measurements, etc. Results: Thirty-one RCTs were included. Of the retrieved RCTs, 4 were with high-quality and 27 were with lower-quality. Conclusion: The quality of the trials is generally low. While there are some evidences that suggest potential effectiveness of acupuncture for hypertension, the results are limited by the methodological flaws of the studies. Therefore, a strict and scientific clinical trial scheme inline with evidence-based medicine is urgently needed in future.
分 类 号:R246.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3