全面深化司法体制改革的两个支点  被引量:4

Two Strong-points in Furthering a Comprehensive Reform of Judicial System

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:冀祥德[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所,北京100720

出  处:《北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2015年第3期50-60,77,共12页Journal of Beijing Union University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基  金:国家社科基金后期资助项目"世界刑事诉讼的四次革命"(项目编号:12FFX026)

摘  要:在全面深化改革关键之年和全面推进依法治国的开局之年中,全面深化司法体制改革既是全面深化改革的法治指引与法治保障,又是全面推进依法治国的关键环节与核心内容。我国从1997年即提出司法改革,十几年来,司法体制改革的决策不可谓没有,司法体制改革的措施不可谓不多,司法体制改革的追求不可谓不强。在一系列的司法改革活动中,既有自下而上的探索实践或者由有关部门、系统自我设计的尝试,又有中央有组织渐次展开的顶层设计。但是,无论哪种形式的司法体制改革,收效皆不显著,甚至招致"狼来了"的社会评价。究其原因,最根本的是没有找准司法体制改革的"牛鼻子",没有找到"撬动"司法体制改革"顽石"的支点,同时,司法体制改革当权者的决心不够、立场不坚,有的司法体制改革决策者本身就是既有体制的获益者。建国六十多年、特别是司法改革十几年来的经验和教训都告诉我们,去司法行政化和去司法地方化是全面深化司法体制改革的两个核心支点,当权者必须以壮士断腕的勇气与果敢,下定决心,持之以恒,层层推进,方能突破长期以来司法体制改革之瓶颈。Judicial reform was started in 1997 in China, we cannot say that there has been no decision, no measure, and no pursuing concerning the reform of judicial system ever since. In a series of judicial reform activities, there are some from-bottom-to-top experiments, or practices self-designed by relative judicial departments, or top designs made and carried out from the central government. However, no matter what kind of judicial reform has been made, the result is not effective. It even invites such negative social comment as "the wolf has come". The basic reason for this is that "the nose of an ox" has not been found in the reform of judicial system. In other words, the pivotal part has not been found to remove the hard rock in the reform. At the same time, the authorities of the reform have not made up their minds in carrying out the reform, or some authorities are themselves the winners of the judicial system. The experiences and lessons of the judicial reform in the past few decades tell us that the administration and localization of justice are the two pivotal points in furthering the reform of judicial system. The authorities must now have the courage to make a prompt decision at the right moment so as to dominate the bottleneck of judicial reform.

关 键 词:司法体制改革 司法行政化 司法地方化 

分 类 号:D926[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象