检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张森[1] 姚卫东[2] 管慧莲 刘莉[1] 姜天仪 汪萌芽[1]
机构地区:[1]皖南医学院细胞电生理研究室,芜湖市241002 [2]皖南医学院弋矶山医院麻醉科
出 处:《中华麻醉学杂志》2015年第4期438-440,共3页Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
基 金:国家级大学生创新创业训练计划(201310368013);国家自然科学基金(30270366、31271155)
摘 要:目的 评价生物节律紊乱对大鼠异丙酚镇静效应的影响.方法 成年雄性SD大鼠32只,体重180~220 g,采用随机数字表法,将其分为4组(n=8):近日节律夜间给药组(CN组)、近日节律日间给药组(CD组)、生物节律紊乱夜间给药组(BN组)和生物节律紊乱日间给药组(BD组).CN组和CD组于12h光照(7:00-19:00)/12 h黑暗(19:00-7:00)交替的实验箱饲养2周;BN组和BD组于24 h光照的实验箱中饲养2周.CN组和BN组分别于14:00时腹腔注射异丙酚75mg/kg;CD组和BD组分别于22:00时腹腔注射异丙酚75 mg/kg.记录翻正反射消失的持续时间,并于翻正反射恢复后20 min时,测定认知功能,分别于学习训练后6、12、24和48 h时,记录被动回避潜伏期.结果 与CN组比较,CD组翻正反射消失持续时间缩短,学习训练后12 h时被动回避潜伏期延长,BN组翻正反射消失持续时间、学习训练后12和24 h时被动回避潜伏期均缩短(P<0.05或0.01);与CD组比较,BD组翻正反射消失持续时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),学习训练后24 h时被动回避潜伏期缩短(P<0.05);BN组与BD组间翻正反射消失持续时间和被动回避潜伏期比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 生物节律紊乱可抵消近日节律对异丙酚镇静效应的影响.Objective To evaluate the effects of biological rhythm disturbance on sedation induced by propofol in rats.Methods Thirty-two adult male Sprague-Dawley rats,weighing 180-220 g,were randomly divided into 4 groups (n =8 each) using a random number table:circadian rhythm + administration during night-time group (group CN),circadian rhythm + administration during day-time group (group CD),biological rhythm+administration during night-time group (group BN),and biological rhythm+administration during day-time group (group BD).In CN and CD groups,the rats were fed for 2 weeks in the experimental boxes in a 12 (7:00-19:00):12 h (19:00-7:00) light:dark cycle.While the rats were fed for 2 weeks in the experimental boxes in a 24 h light cycle.Propofol 75 mg/kg was intraperitoneally injected at 14:00 in CN and BN groups,or at 22:00 in CD and BD groups.The duration of loss of righting reflex was recorded.At 20 min after recovery of righting reflex,the cognitive function was assessed.The latency of passive avoidance was measured at 6,12,24 and 48 h after training.Results Compared with group CN,the duration of loss of righting reflex was significantly shortened,and the latency of passive avoidance was prolonged at 12 and 24 h after training in group CD,and the duration of loss of righting reflex and latency of passive avoidance at 12 and 24 h after training were shortened in group BN.Compared with group CD,no significant change was found in the duration of loss of righting reflex,and the latency of passive avoidance was significantly shortened at 24 h after training in group BD.There was no significant change between BN group and BD group in the duration of loss of righting reflex and latency of passive avoidance.Conclusion Biological rhythm disturbance can counteract circadian rhythmproduced effects on sedation induced by propofol in rats.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.185.190