检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张淑慧[1] 曾庆玉[1] 尹晓明[1] 吴戈[1] 邓茂松[1] 刘建新[1]
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2015年第8期1238-1241,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
摘 要:目的探讨阑尾穿孔具有诊断价值的CT征象。方法回顾性分析205例经手术病理证实的穿孔性和非穿孔性阑尾炎患者的CT图像。观察12项急性阑尾炎的CT征象,采用χ2检验筛选可用于鉴别诊断穿孔性与非穿孔性阑尾炎的CT征象,评价这些征象的敏感度、特异度和准确率。采用Logistic回归分析法分析阑尾穿孔最具诊断价值的CT征象。结果 205例中,40例(40/205,19.51%)阑尾穿孔与165例(165/205,80.49%)阑尾未穿孔患者间,脓肿、阑尾壁强化缺损、蜂窝织炎、阑尾腔外积气、阑尾腔外粪石差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05),各征象鉴别诊断穿孔性和非穿孔性阑尾炎的敏感度、特异度和准确率依次分别为:脓肿80.00%(32/40)、97.58%(161/165)、94.15%(193/205),阑尾壁强化缺损50.00%(20/40)、98.79%(163/165)、89.27%(183/205),蜂窝织炎37.50%(15/40)、95.76%(158/165)、84.39%(173/205),阑尾腔外积气27.50%(11/40)、99.39%(164/165)、85.37%(175/205),阑尾腔外粪石5.00%(2/40)、100.00%(165/165)、81.46%(167/205),Logistic回归分析显示脓肿、阑尾壁强化缺损与阑尾穿孔相关(Wald=33.21、16.19,P均<0.001)。结论脓肿、阑尾壁强化缺损是阑尾穿孔最有诊断价值的CT征象。Objective To explore the necessary CT findings for diagnosing perforated appendicitis. Methods CT images of 205 patients with acute appendicitis confirmed pathologically were reviewed retrospectively. CT findings of acute appen- dicitis were classified into twelve catogories. Chi-square test was performed to select CT findings which can be used to dis- tinguish perforated from nonperforated appendicitis, and then their sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were analyzed. The stepwise Logistic regression analysis was performed to find out the valuable findings. Results In 205 cases, the differences of following five findings were statistical significance between patients with perforated appendicitis (40/205, 19.51%) and patients with nonperforated appendicitis (165/205, 80.49%all P〈0.05), and their sensitivity, specificity and accuracy as followed, i.e. abscess (80.00% [32/40], 97.58%0 [161/165], 94.15% [193/205]), enhancement defect in appen- diceal wall (50.00% [20/40], 98.79% [163/165], 89.27% [183/205]), phlegmon (37.50% [15/40], 95.76% [158/ 165], 84.39% [173/205]), appendiceal extraluminal air (27.50%[11/40], 99.39% [164/165], 85.37% [175/205]), external coprolith of epityphlon (5.00%[2/40]1, 100% [165/165], 81.46% [167/205]. The abscess and enhancement de- fect in appendiceal wall showed statistically significant association with perforated appendicitis on Logistic regression analy- sis (Wald=33.21, 16.19, both P〈0. 001). Conclusion Abscess, enhancement defect in appendiceal wall are the most valuable findings for diagnosing perforated appendicitis.
分 类 号:R814.42[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R574.61[医药卫生—放射医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3