检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国科学院文献情报中心,北京100190 [2]中国科学院兰州文献情报中心,甘肃省兰州市730030 [3]中国科学院大学,北京市100049
出 处:《中国科技期刊研究》2015年第8期822-827,共6页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
摘 要:【目的】梳理国内外学术期刊论文更正的研究发展脉络,以期为今后的相关研究提供借鉴和参考。【方法】采用文献调研法,通过调研国内外有关期刊论文更正的研究文献,对比分析国内外研究的现状与特点。【结果】分析发现,国内外对该问题的研究文献有限,就目前仅有的研究文献来看,国内研究的视野较窄,局限于从期刊自身建设的角度进行探讨,国外则站在更高的角度,从学术界加强科研自律、加强科研道德规范的角度予以研究。此外,截止目前的研究都只关注到更正行为本身,而并未对更正行为产生的更正文献有所关注。【结论】在今后的研究中,应加强对更正文献的关注,积极探索和挖掘更正文献本身的价值和影响力,以呼吁学术界对更正文献的关注和重视。[ Purposes] This paper reviews the development vein of the domestic and foreign research literatures about academic journal corrections, aiming at providing reference for future researches. [ Methods] With the literature research method, the paper investigates the domestic and foreign research literatures about academic journal corrections, and analyzes the present research situation and characteristics at home and abroad. [Findings ] The analyses show the current research about academic journal corrections at home and abroad is not sufficient. According to the current research, the domestic research perspective is narrow, which is limited to periodical construction of journal itself. The foreign researchers stand on a higher perspective, who state in the context of enhancement of the scientific research discipline and ethics. Moreover, the current research simply focuses on correct behavior itself, but the present research doesn't involve the correction records resulting from correct behavior. [ Conclusions ] Therefore, we should enhance the focus of correction records, actively explore and exploit the value and influence of correction records, in order to call attention to attach importance to correction records.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70