城中村改造中承租人损失补偿的请求权基础  

The Foundation of Right of the Claim for Tenants' Compensation in Urban-village Renovation

作　　者：于凤瑞[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学公共管理学院,北京100084

出　　处：《河北法学》2015年第9期114-127,共14页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金<大陆城中村改造与台湾都市更新财产权法律制度比较研究>(2014M550689)

摘　　要：租赁合同因交易专用性财产价值很大而无法自我调节时,有必要通过适当的规制结构加以辅助,使得承租人利益得到保障。其他国家和地区的城市更新通常采取安置承租人或者明确承租人对出租人损失补偿请求权的保障模式。在我国既无法律明文规定,政府机构又对非村民利益无力顾及的情况下,明确承租人损失补偿的请求权基础,使之可以通过司法途径实现权利救济是现实路径。基于后合同义务的损害赔偿请求权、代偿请求权、不当得利请求权三条路径可以作为承租人损失补偿的请求权基础,请求权的选择需依个案确定。Special governance structures are needed to protect tenants ＇ interests when transaction-specific values of lease contract are too great to adjust itself in urbanvillage renovation. protecting tenants When the laws Resettlement and definite claim for compensation are two ways of interests used by are silent, and compensation, clarify the foundation other countries and districts in urban renewal. gove of rig the realistic option. Right of requesting contract duty, right of subrogation and could be the basis of claim. rnment is busy focusing on villagesI ht of the claim for tenants＇compensation is for compensation for claim for returning damage based on postunjustified enrichment

关 键 词：城中村改造 风险分配 后合同义务 代偿请求权 不当得利请求权 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]