人际需求问卷中文版测评大学生样本的效度与信度  

Validity and Reliability of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire in Chinese College Students

作　　者：李晓敏[1] 辛铁钢[1] 袁靖[1] 吕丽霞[1] 陶佳雨[1] 刘勇 

机构地区：[1]承德医学院,承德067000 [2]铁力市职业教育中心学校,铁力152500

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2015年第4期590-593,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：河北省社会科学基金项目(HB13JY055)

摘　　要：目的：在中国大学生群体中引入人际需求问卷（Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire,INQ）,并检验其信效度。方法：通过4次抽样,共计调查1268名有效被试。其中,另抽取120人完成INQ中文版与UCLA孤独量表（UCLA-LS）、二维自尊量表（SLCR）、中文人生意义问卷（C-MLQ）、归属感问卷（SBQ）、Beck自杀意念量表（BSI）来考核效标关联效度。67人在2周后进行了重测,检验其重测信度。结果：INQ中文版分为归属受挫和自我累赘感知两个维度,共15个条目。总问卷和分问卷的α系数在0.71~0.87之间;间隔2周后的重测信度在0.72~0.81之间;模型拟合度较好：RMSEA=0.074,CFI=0.917,TLI=0.891,χ2/df=2.984,SRMR=0.086;INQ具有良好的效标关联效度。结论：人际需求问卷中文版具有较好的信效度,可用于评估个体的人际需求状况及预测个体风险行为。Objective： To introduce the interpersonal needs questionnaire（INQ）, and apply it to Chinese university stu- dents. Methods： A total 1268 university students were recruited from three samplings. 120 of 1268 students were asked to complete self-liking/self-competence seale（SLCR）, UCLA loneliness scal（UCLA-LS）, beck scale for suicide ideation（BSI）, Chinese meaning in life questionnaire（C-MLQ） and the sense of belonging questionnaire（SBQ）. 67 students were chosen to complete the Chinese version of INQ after 2 weeks. Results： The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the structure of the INQ was rational： RMSEA=0.074, CFI=0.917, TLI=0.891, x2/df=-2.984, SRMR=0.086. The Cronbaeh＇ alpha coefficient of the INQ and all subscales ranged from 0.71 to 0.87. The test-retest reliabilities was 0.72-0.81. The INQ had good criteri- on related validity. Conclusion： The Chinese version of INQ is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing interpersonal needs of university students.

关 键 词：人际需求 信度 效度 大学生 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]