特拉华欺负受害量表(学生卷)中文版信、效度研究  

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Delaware Bullying Victimization Scale-student

作　　者：谢家树[1] 吕永晓 George G.Bear Chunyan Yang Seth J.Marshall Rong Gong 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学教育科学学院,长沙410081 [2]University of Delaware,Newark,DE 19716 [3]Middle Tennessee State University,Murfreesboro,TN 37132

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2015年第4期594-596,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：湖南省哲学社科规划基金项目(14YBA278)资助

摘　　要：目的:检验特拉华欺负受害量表(学生卷)(DBVS-S)中文版在中国青少年中的信度和效度。方法:应用中文版DBVS-S对湖南省4个地区10所学校小学六年级至高三2443名学生施测,以流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、学生生活满意度量表(SLSS)和Olweus儿童欺负问卷(BVQ)为效标,测评效标关联效度,随机抽取其中2个班计117名被试间隔4周后重测。结果:1DBVS-S中文版维度结构与原量表一致,探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析均支持三因子结构模型;2DVBS-S中文版总分与CES-D和BVQ的相关系数分别为0.360和0.766(P<0.001),与SLSS的相关系数为-0.184(P<0.001);3总量表α系数为0.839,4周后的重测相关系数为0.684。结论:特拉华欺负受害量表(学生卷)中文版具有较好的信效度。Objective： To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Delaware Bullying Victimiza- tion Scale-Student（DBVS-S）. Methods： 2443 students were measured, 117 of which participated the test-retest 4 weeks later. CES-D, SLSS and BVQ were used as the criteria-related validity instrument. Results： ①Exploratory and confirmato- ry factor analyses showed the scale was composed of 3 factors; ②The DBVS-S had significant positive correlation with CES-D and BVQ; ③Cronbach＇ sot coefficients of the Chinese Version of the DBVS-S was 0.839, and the test-retest reli- ability was 0.684. Conclusion： The Chinese version of DBVS-S has acceptable psychometric properties.

关 键 词：特拉华欺负受害量表 信度 效度 心理测量学研究 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]