检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏敏[1,2] 毕勇毅[2] 鲁植艳[2,3] 刘星[2,4] 梅四清[5]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学人民医院产科,武汉430060 [2]武汉大学公共卫生学院,武汉430071 [3]武汉大学中南医院,武汉430071 [4]井冈山大学实验室,吉安343009 [5]武汉大学人民医院检验科,武汉430060
出 处:《微循环学杂志》2015年第3期65-66,共2页Chinese Journal of Microcirculation
摘 要:目的:观察妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者血浆D-二聚体和国际标准化比值(INR)水平变化。方法:随机选取孕34周以上GDM患者50例(GDM组),孕34周以上正常妇女52例(对照组),分别用免疫比浊法和凝固法检测两组孕妇血浆D-二聚体浓度和INR[通过凝血酶原时间(PT)计算],对比分析组间差异。结果:GDM组患者D-二聚体浓度显著高于对照组(2.54±1.83vs 1.83±0.95,P<0.05);GDM组INR虽低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(0.99±0.20vs 1.02±0.37,P>0.05)。结论:GDM患者的血液凝固性和纤溶代偿功能均高于正常孕妇,需防范其血栓并发症及产后出血。Objective: To observe the changes of plasma D-dimer and international normalized ratio (INR) level in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients. Method: 50 cases of gestational diabetes over 34 gestational weeks were randomly selected into GDM group;52 normal pregnant women over 34 gestational weeks as the control group, both groups were tested for maternal plasma D-dimer and INR levels and were comparatived for analysis. Results: GDM group D-dimer was higher than the control group (2.54±1. 83 vs 1.83 ± 0. 95, P〈 0. 05); GDM group INR lower than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.99±0.20 vs 1.02± 0.37, P〉0.05). Conclusion: GDM patients blood coagulation and fibrinolysis compensatory function were higher than normal pregnant women, and therefore need to prevent thrombotic complications and postpartum hemorrhage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222