不同清洗方法对供应室器械清洗效果对比观察  

The comparative observation of the effect of different cleaning methods in cleaning equipment supply room

作　　者：王静 

机构地区：[1]江苏省扬中市新坝中心卫生院,江苏扬中212211

出　　处：《中国医药科学》2015年第8期199-201,共3页China Medicine And Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的探讨供应室器械不同清洗方法清洗效果对比。方法选取重复使用的不同用途医疗器械作为研究材料,均为2013年6月~2014年6月收集,就传统的单纯清洗法（对照组,n=200）与依据器械用途分类,综合清洗法（观察组,n=200）效果进行对比。结果观察组1选取管腔类器械隐血试验合格率为98%,目测＋5倍放大镜合格率为99%;对照组1分别为86%,85%;观察组2分别为99%,98%;对照组2分别为85%,86%,观察组与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论供应室确保无菌物品质量是工作核心,对不良事件的防范具重要意义。Objective To investigate the effect of different methods in cleaning supply room equipment. Methods The different reusable medical devices were selected as research material,were collected from June 2013 to June 2014,were randomly allocated into traditional cleaning method group（the control group,n=200）and comprehensive cleaning method group in accordance with the instrument use classification（the observation group,n=200）,the results were compared. Results Group A choose lumen type devices occult blood test,the pass rate was 98%,＋5 visual magnifying glass with a pass rate of 99%;the control group A were 86%,85%;the observation group B were 99%,98%;group B were 85%,86%,between the observation group and the control group,the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Ensuring the quality of the sterile supply room is the core work,the prevention of adverse events has the important significance.

关 键 词：不同清洗方法 供应室器械 清洗效果 对比观察 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]