检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈雪[1] 石晓聪[1] 彭宇辉[1] 倪连松[2]
机构地区:[1]温州医科大学温州市第三临床学院(温州市人民医院)内分泌科,温州325000 [2]温州医科大学附属第一医院内分泌科
出 处:《数理医药学杂志》2015年第9期1314-1316,共3页Journal of Mathematical Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较胰岛素泵持续皮下输注与多次皮下注射强化治疗血糖控制不佳2型糖尿病的短期疗效及可能影响因素。方法:选取血糖控制不佳2型糖尿患者135例,随机分为两组,研究组给予胰岛素泵皮下输注,对照组予多次皮下注射降血糖治疗,观察住院期间各组血糖等多项指标。结果:胰岛素泵组在血糖达标时间、胰岛素用量、住院天数低于多次皮下注射组,血糖控制良好率优于多次皮下注射组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。低血糖发生率方面,两组无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:胰岛素泵持续皮下注射短期降糖效果显著,快速并安全有效。Objective:To compare the clinical short-term efficacy of intensive treatment through continuous subcutaneousinsulin infusion and multiple subcutaneous insulin injection on type 2 Diabetes featuring with poor glucose control and possible influential factors.Methods:135 patients withtype 2 diabetes featuring with poor glucose were selected.They were randomly divided into2 groups.The research group were treated with CSII and the control group received MSII.Observe the glucose and other indicators of the 2 groups during hospitalization .Results:Recovery timeof blood sugar in the research group and the length of stay were shorter than that in the control group ,and the insulin dosage wasless than that in the control group and the rate of blood sugar controlled properly was also higher than that in control group(P < 0.05),the differences were all statistically significant.As for the incidence rate of hypoglycemia ,there was no obvious difference between the 2 groups.Conclusion:Compared with MSII,CSII is more effective to lower blood glucose in a short time and it is safe.
关 键 词:胰岛素 短期胰岛素泵强化治疗 2型糖尿病
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3