检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学政治学研究院
出 处:《社会主义研究》2015年第4期142-148,共7页Socialism Studies
摘 要:村庄政治进入选举时代后,选举权力模式取代市场和文化议题在村庄权力研究中被广泛接受。但选举权力模式也存在一些缺陷:注重选举过程而缺乏考察选举与治理的关系,忽视其他权力资源分配机制而压缩了村庄权力的研究范围。生产权力模式运用竞争、参与和服从三维框架可以展现村庄精英在选举和治理阶段的行动逻辑,从而能够实现对选举权力模式的扩展。As rural politics enter into the election era, the power election mode, replacing the themes of market and culture, has been quite popular in the research of rural power, yet the power election mode also has some defects, pay attention to election process while less consideration of the relation between election and governance, and narrowing of the research scope of rural power because of ignorance of other power resource distribution mechanisms. The power producing mode applies competition, participation and obedience to demonstrate the operation logic of rural elites in election and governance, thereby expanding the power electing mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3