检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘传稿[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院
出 处:《南京社会科学》2015年第8期108-112,共5页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关课题"法治国家建设中的司法判例制度研究"(10JZD0030)的阶段性成果
摘 要:台湾地区的刑事判例制度在实现法律续造、统一法律见解等方面发挥了重要的作用,但同时也存在违背权力分立和法官独立审判原则、刑事判例变更不妥当等问题。大陆地区的刑事案例指导制度是我国司法实践的新产物,它是我国在推动司法科学化、规范化、公正化的过程中建立的。目前,我们应当充分汲取台湾地区刑事判例制度的成功经验,避免其出现的问题,使刑事案例指导制度不断完善。The criminal precedent system of Taiwan has played an important role in achieving further development of Law, uniting legal opinions and so on. But at the same time this system also has some problems, for example, violating the principle of the separation of powers and the independence of judges, changing of criminal precedent is not appropriate etc. Criminal case directing system of mainland is a new product of judicial practice, which was built in the process of promoting judicature more scientific, normative and judicial. At present, we should fully learn the successful experience of criminal precedent system of Taiwan, prevent ever emerging issues, promote criminal case di- recting system of mainland for continuous improvement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15