检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁佳[1]
机构地区:[1]广西中医药大学第一附属医院,广西南宁530023
出 处:《大众科技》2015年第7期102-103,共2页Popular Science & Technology
摘 要:目的:探讨使用口咽通气管的患者发生呕吐时,两种清理呼吸道的方法,并比较临床应用效果。方法:选取广西中医药大学第一附属医院急诊科2011年10月~2014年10月诊治的意识障碍并放置口咽通气管进行通气救治,在使用口咽通气管期间发生呕吐的患者60例,随机分为对照组30例,观察组30例,采取两种方法清理呼吸道并比较应用效果。结果:观察组所采取清理呼吸道方法应用效果优于对照组。结论:观察组所采用清理呼吸道方法较好,其操作成功率高、病人出现并发症少、操作难度降低、操作时间缩短、成本降低。Objective: To investigate patients with oropharyngeal snorkel vomiting, two clear airway approach and compare the clinical effect. Methods: First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University Emergency Department in October 2011 - October 2014 diagnosis and treatment of consciousness and placed oropharyngeal snorkel ventilatory treatment, 60 patients vomiting during use oropharyngeal snorkel, randomly divided into control group of 30 patients, 30 cases of the observation group, take two methods to clean up the respiratory tract and compare application results. Results: The method of application of the clear airway take effect than the control group. Conclusion: The study group used a better method to clean up the respiratory tract, the operation success rate, fewer patient complications, reduce the difficulty of the operation, the operation time is shortened, and reduce costs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112