检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄金宝[1] 王田勇 胡燕燕[1] 纪春茹[1] 杨卫斌[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江北大荒农业股份有限公司八五四分公司,黑龙江虎林158403
出 处:《北方水稻》2015年第4期27-29,共3页North Rice
摘 要:通过施用硅钙肥与常规施肥以及八五四农场当地硅肥做对比试验,研究硅钙肥在八五四农场水稻上的应用效果。结果表明,与常规施肥相比,硅钙肥与常规硅肥分别增产19.4、10.9 kg/667 m2,增产3.28%、1.84%,硅钙肥处理比常规硅肥增产8.5 kg/667 m2,增产1.42%。从效益分析来看,硅钙肥处理和常规硅肥处理在单位面积收益、净增效益方面高于常规施肥处理。与常规施肥相比,分别比当地常规施肥增加效益38.6元和18.7元/667 m2;硅钙肥处理比常规硅肥处理增效益19.9元/667 m2。Contrast test between Si-Ca fertilizer and general chemical fertilizer were made to research the application effect on rice. The result indicated that compare with general chemical fertilizer, Si-Ca fertilizer and conventional Si fertilizer can increase yield by 19.4 kg/667 m2,10.9 kg/667 m2, and its yield-increase rate was 3.28% and 1.84%, Si-Ca fertilizer can increase yield by 8.5 kg/667 m2 and yield-increase rate by 1.42% than conventional Si fertilizer. The income and net profit by using Si-Ca fertilizer and conventional Si fertilizer was higher than general chemical fertilizer which was 38.6 yuan and 18.7 yuan]667 mE, Si-Ca fertilizer can increase income by 19.9 yuan/667 m2 than conventional Si fertilizer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3