高烈度地震区公路路线方案评价  被引量:2

Evaluation of highway alignment in high seismic intensity region

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:贾兴利[1] 陈文强 陈春[3] 许金良[1] 孙宇 

机构地区:[1]长安大学特殊地区公路工程教育部重点实验室,陕西西安710064 [2]贵州省安顺市交通建设工程质量监督站,贵州安顺561000 [3]中国交通建设股份有限公司投资事业部,北京100088 [4]山东省胶州市城乡建设局,山东青岛266300

出  处:《长安大学学报(自然科学版)》2015年第4期13-19,53,共8页Journal of Chang’an University(Natural Science Edition)

基  金:交通运输部西部交通建设科技项目(2009 318 000 102);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(310821151007)

摘  要:为了提高震区公路的抗震防灾能力,提出了考虑地震风险的高烈度地震区公路路线方案评价方法。从路线方案评价关键影响因素分析出发,建立了包含地震风险、经济、环境、安全的两层次路线方案评价指标体系;采用标度分值和专家打分相结合的方法,构建了评价因子的量化模型;确定了以多准则评价为基础的高烈度地震区路线方案评价方法,建立了基于方案达成度和综合度的交互式路线评价模型;最后以甘肃陇南某震区公路为实例,对评价方法进行了实例分析验证。研究结果表明:实例分析的路线A方案综合风险值为11.91,B方案为7.87;A方案安全指标为14.5,B方案为16;B方案经济指标和环境指标大于A方案;A方案的达成度为0.660,B方案的达成度为1.852,最优方案为B方案;给出的评价方法能有效量化地震风险对路线方案的影响,计算结果准确可行。In order to improve the seismic disaster prevention capability of road, the evaluation method of highway scheme in high seismic intensity region was proposed. With the analysis on key factors influencing the alignment selection, a two-level assessment system with seismic risk, economy, environment and safety as index was established. Using the method of scale scores and expert scores, the quantitative model of evaluation factors was established. Considering the environmental features in high seismic intensity region, evaluation method of highway scheme in high seismic intensity region based on multiple criteria evaluation was defined, and the interactive evaluation model of highway alignment based on alternative achievement and complexity degree was set up, and the method was verified by taking certain seismic road of Southern Gansu as instance. The results show that the comprehensive risk of route A is 11.91, and that of route B is 7.87. The security index of route A is 14.5, and that of route B is 16. The economic index and environmental index of route B are greater than those of route A, and the achievement degree of route A and route B are 0. 660, 1. 852 respectively, and the optimal solution is route B. The assessment methods effectively reflects seismic risk of highway scheme, and the assessment model is feasible. 4 tabs, 4 figs, 17 refs.

关 键 词:道路工程 路线方案评价 多属性决策 地震 地理信息系统 

分 类 号:U416[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象