商标纠纷适用一事不再理原则探析  

Study on the Application of Non Bis in Idem in Trademark Disputes

作　　者：胡军辉[1,2] 蒋貌 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院 [2]湘潭大学法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心

出　　处：《知识产权》2015年第8期41-46,共6页Intellectual Property

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目<第三人撤销之诉研究>(13YJA820012)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：一事不再理原则起源于罗马法,其效力内涵经历了一个逐步发展的过程。我国现行民事诉讼法司法解释对这一原则作了一般性规定,商标法律、规定对这一原则作了特别规定。在司法实践中,法院对于如何适用一事不再理原则形成了一些稳定的看法,对类似案件的处理具有一定的参考作用。此外,一事不再理原则的功能可以通过多种方式进行进一步的优化。The principle of non bis in idem, which efficiency and connotation has experienced a progressive development, originated from Rome law. Our judicial interpretation of the current civil procedure law makes the general provisions about the principle of non bis in idem and the law about trademark makes the special provisions about the principle of non bis in idem. In the judicial practice, the court has formed some stable views on how to apply to the principle of non bis in idem, which has a certain reference function for dealing with similar cases. In addition, the function of the principle of non bis in idem could be further optimized by a variety of ways.

关 键 词：商标纠纷 一事不再理 功能优化 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]