检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东莞市塘厦医院,东莞523721
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2015年第7期657-659,共3页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的观察毫火针治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的临床疗效。方法将72例肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组36例。治疗组采用毫火针治疗,对照组采用常规针刺治疗。观察两组治疗前后简化麦吉尔疼痛量表(MPQ)评分,比较两组临床疗效。结果治疗组总有效率和愈显率分别为94.4%和77.8%,对照组分别为80.6%和30.6%。两组愈显率比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组治疗后MPQ量表各项评分(PRI、PPI及VAS)与同组治疗前比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗后MPQ量表各项评分与对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论毫火针是一种治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的有效方法。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of fire-needle acupuncture in treating myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). Method Seventy-two patients with MPS were randomized into a treatment group and a control group, 36 in each group. The treatment group was intervened by fire-needle acupuncture, while the control group was by ordinary acupuncture. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) was observed before and after the intervention, and the clinical efficacy was compared. Result The total effective rate and markedly-effective rate were respectively 94.4% and 77.8% in the treatment group versus 80.6% and 30.6%in the control group. There was a significant difference in comparing the markedly-effective rate between the two groups (P〈0.01). The MPQ item scores [pain rating index (PRI), present pain intensity (PPI), and visual analogue scale (VAS)] were significantly changed after intervention in both groups (P〈0.05). After intervention, the MPQ item scores of the treatment group were significantly different from that of the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Fire-needle acupuncture is an effective method in treating MPS.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.125.27