大部制改革整合评估框架:要素、理念与效用  

The Integrated Assessment Framework of the Super-ministry System Reform:Elements,Ideas and Utility

作　　者：徐艳晴[1] 周志忍[2] 

机构地区：[1]海南大学政治与公共管理学院,海南海口570228 [2]北京大学政府管理学院,北京100871

出　　处：《北京行政学院学报》2015年第4期51-58,共8页Journal of Beijing administration institute

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(05JZDH0019);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71173004);海南省高等学校科学研究专项项目(Hnkyzy-201404);北京大学"国家治理协同创新中心"项目

摘　　要：大部制改革研究的缺憾之一是缺乏一个整合评估框架。框架构建的学术价值在于推动研究的系统性、相关性和持续深入,实践意义主要在于体现责任政府理念。项目评估的相关研究是框架构建的理论基础.新西兰大部制改革则提供了经验借鉴。整合评估框架围绕大部制改革的三大环节设计,包括12个要素或考察维度,体现了结果导向、责任政府等现代理念。The lack of an integrated assessment framework is one of shortcomings of the super-ministry system reform. The theoretical significance of an integrated assessment framework is to promote related researches in a systematic, continued and deep way while the practical significance is to mainly reflect the concept of responsible government. The related research on project assessment is the theoretical basis of the assessment framework and the super-ministry system reform in New Zealand can provides an experience. The integrated assessment framework centering on the super-ministry system reform can fall into three categories, includes 12 elements or dimensions and reflects some modern concepts, such as results-oriented, responsible government.

关 键 词：大部制 整合框架 价值理念 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学]