检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学公共管理与法学学院,辽宁大连116024
出 处:《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第4期72-78,共7页Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"农户集合决策与农地用途演化的互动机理研究"(71203017)
摘 要:以制度能力作为分析框架研究村庄治理绩效是乡村治理研究视角上的创新。通过实证调查方法,探析制度能力与村庄治理绩效关系,并进一步探究制度能力各要素对治理绩效的影响程度。研究表明:制度能力与村庄治理绩效具有正相关关系,内部动员能力的"精英信任因子"对治理绩效的影响最大;传统动员模式对治理绩效的影响已不再明显;外部动员能力对村庄治理绩效有显著正向影响。Institutional capacity as an analytical framework to study the performance of village governance is an innovative per- spective on rural governance. Through empirical investigation methods, the relationship of institutional capacity and villages Gov- ernance Performance is analyzed. The impact of institutional capacity elements to the village governance performance is explored. It is a positive correlation between institutional capacity and governance performance. The factor of "elite trust" in the internal mobilization is one of the most important factors. The influence of traditional modes of governance performance of mobilization is no longer evident. External mobilization has a significant positive impact on village governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28