保证金退还制度下废旧电器电子产品回收定价模型  

The recycling- pricing model of waste electric and electronic products in the deposit refund system

作　　者：高艳红[1] 陈德敏[1] 张瑞[2] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆400044 [2]重庆交通大学管理学院,重庆400074

出　　处：《科研管理》2015年第8期152-160,共9页Science Research Management

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(12&ZD209);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2012M511898);重庆市博士后研究人员科研项目特别资助项目(XM20120024);重庆市社会科学规划项目(2013QNJJ18)

摘　　要：通过分析废旧电器电子产品回收市场保证金退还制度的作用机理,本文分别建立了不考虑劳动力机会成本和考虑劳动力机会成本两种情形下废旧电器电子产品的回收定价模型,并比较了它们的结果。研究表明:(1)保证金对解决正规回收处理设备产能过剩以及补偿企业处理成本和劳动力机会成本有显著效果。(2)在其他变量取值不变的情况下,考虑劳动力机会成本时的回收价格要高于不考虑机会成本的回收价格。(3)两种定价模式下,正规回收再制造渠道的回收比例与回收价格的关系均为负相关;消费者在购买电器电子产品时缴纳的保证金越多,回收价格越高。(4)两种定价模式下回收再制造企业的利润保持不变,但是不同定价模式之间回收利润表现出很大的差异性。By analyzing the mechanism of the Deposit Refund System in the recycling market of waste electric and electronic products, the paper established the recycling - pricing models of waste electric and electronic products under two circumstances, without considering the labor opportunity cost and the opportunity cost, and compared their results. The reseamh showed that： （ 1 ） The deposit has a significant effect to solve the overcapacity of the normal recycling equipment and to compensate for the han- dling cost and the opportunity cost of Labor; （2）In the case of other variables are constant values, the recycling price is higher when considering the opportunity cost of labor than that without considering the opportunity cost; （ 3 ） Under two kinds of pricing model, the relations of the recovery ratio and the recycling price in formal recycling channels is negative correlation; The more deposit paid by consumers when buying electric and electronic products, the recycling price is higher; （4）The recycling profits remain unchanged under each pricing mode, but it shows great differences between different pricing models.

关 键 词：保证金退还制度 废旧电器电子产品 劳动力机会成本 回收定价 

分 类 号：F205[经济管理—国民经济]