检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学水利工程学院,辽宁大连116024
出 处:《水利与建筑工程学报》2015年第4期96-100,136,共6页Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering
基 金:"十二五"水专项"面向水质改善的饮马河生态修复成套技术研究与综合示范(2012ZX07207-007-05)
摘 要:以黑顶子河治理工程为例,利用层次分析法确定生态护岸各指标的权重,利用模糊综合评价法对生态护岸形式进行综合评价,优选结果表明,治理段保育区、景观区、保护区的护岸形式可分别采用生态混凝土护岸、阶梯石笼插枝护岸、石笼挡墙护岸。该方法具有较强的合理性和可靠性,能够为生态护岸形式优选提供科学的指导。In order to avoid the effect of subjective judgment and preferences on the optimization of ecological revetment forms, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process which combined the merits of analytic hierarchy method and fuzzy comprehen- sive evaluation method was adopted in the analysis of Heidingzi river treatment engineering. At first the analytic hierarchy process was adopted to determine the weight of each index of the ecological revetment, and then the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to evaluate the forms of ecological revetment. The optimization result indicates that the revet- ment forms are preferably ecological concrete revetment, revetment with stepped stone cages and cuttings, revetment with stone cage retaining wall for the conservation area, landscape area and protection area in the treatment section respective- ly. This scheme is applicable and reliable, it can provide some scientific guidance in the optimization of ecological revet- ment forms.
分 类 号:TV861[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28