检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺剑[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院
出 处:《法学家》2015年第4期95-115,179,共21页The Jurist
基 金:国家社科基金特别委托项目(项目批准号:14&ZH061);博士后科学基金特别资助项目(资助编号:2015T80161的阶段性成果
摘 要:婚姻法《解释三》第5条、第10条对困扰司法实务多年的夫妻个人财产的婚后增值归属问题作了规定。虽然第5条存在比较法的误会,不足为训,但第10条却蕴含增值归属的一般规则,可以解决按揭房屋增值归属等众多实务难题。在现行法上,基于婚姻命运共同体理念,我国的婚后所得共同制应理解为"婚后劳动和运气所得共同制",夫妻个人财产的婚后增值应一律为夫妻共同财产。《解释三》第5条、第10条在立法论上应手废除,在解释论上应予架空或重新解释。In recent years,Chinese courts have been constantly stormed by various issues on the classification of the appreciation of separate property during marriage.The Judicial Interpretation Ⅲ on Marriage Law(Interpretation Ⅲ) of 2011 borrowed the idea of active and passive appreciation from the U.S.marriage law in general(Art.5),and developed a rule similar to In re Marriage of Moore,28 Cal.3d 366(1980) in particular(Art.10).This paper explores this classification issue from two perspectives;under the Interpretation Ⅲ and under the Marriage Law.Under the Interpretation Ⅲ,this paper develops a general rule similar to,but much broader than Art.10 and applies it to solve many troublesome classification issues in practice.Under the Marriage Law,this paper sheds light on the grave deviation of all aforementioned rales in the Interpretation Ⅲ from the current law and argues for an alternative solution,that the appreciation of separate property during marriage should be classified as marital.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3