应用脑室镜治疗脑室出血与单纯脑室穿刺外引流术的疗效比较  

Comparison of the curative effect of ventricularendoscope and simple ventricle puncture external drainage in treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage

作　　者：李炳森[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省开平市中心医院神经外科,广东开平529300

出　　处：《中国医药科学》2015年第15期209-211,共3页China Medicine And Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的探讨应用脑室镜治疗脑室出血与单纯脑室穿刺外引流术的疗效比较情况。方法分析我院2012年12月～2014年12月收治的60例脑室出血患者的临床资料，依据治疗措施不同进行分组，对照组30例和实验组30例。结果实验组脑室出血患者意识转清、血肿基本清除率和平均引流时间明显优于对照组，实验组脑室出血患者临床治疗总有效率明显高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论应用脑室镜治疗脑室出血血肿清除率高，临床疗效明显，预后恢复较好，值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the comparison of the curative effect of ventricularendoscope and simple ventricle puncture external drainage in treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage. Methods Data of 60 patients with intraventricular hemorrhage who admitted to our hospital from December 2012 to December 2014 were analyzed and they were admitted to the control group and the experimental group according to different treatment methods, with 30 in each. Results Recovering consciousness, rate of removed hematoma and average drainage time of patients with intraventricular hemorrhage in the experimental group were superior to those of the control group and the total clinical effective rate of them in the experimental group was higher than that of the control group （P 〈 0.05）. The difference was statistical significant. Conclusion Ventricularendoscope in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage has a higher rate of removed hematoma, a significant clinicat curative effect and a better prognosis recovery, worthy of clinical promotion and application.

关 键 词：脑室镜 脑室出血 单纯脑室穿刺外引流术 比较 

分 类 号：R651[医药卫生—外科学]