检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆三峡中心医院,重庆404000 [2]重庆医科大学,重庆400016 [3]川北医学院,四川南充637000
出 处:《中国现代应用药学》2015年第8期1013-1016,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
基 金:重庆市科技计划项目(CSTC;2009AC5195);重庆市万州区科技计划项目(201403055)
摘 要:目的系统评价噻奈普汀与氟西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性。方法计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库、维普全文数据库、万方数据库、Pub Med、Medline、EMBase中关于噻奈普汀与氟西汀治疗抑郁症的随机对照试验(RCT),对纳入的RCT采用Cochrane系统评价的方法进行评价,采用Rev Man 5.0统计软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入5项研究,合计942例患者,meta分析结果显示,噻奈普汀组患者有效率[OR=1.25,95%CI(0.93,1.66),P=0.13]与氟西汀组比较差异无统计学意义;在不良反应发生率方面,2组比较差异有统计学意义[OR=0.53,95%CI(0.36~0.77),P〈0.001]。结论噻奈普汀与氟西汀治疗抑郁症疗效相当,不良反应少。但该结论尚需高质量、设计严谨的RCT进一步证实。OBJECTIVE To evaluate the difference and safety of tianeptine and fluoxetine in the treatment of depression. METHODS Retrieved from CNKI, VIP, Wanfang database, Pub Med, Medline and EMBase, RCTs about tianeptine with fluoxetine in treatment of depression were collected and evaluated by Cochrane systematic review. Meta-analysis was carried out by using Rev Man 5.0 software. RESULTS The 5 studies were included, involving 942 patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical significant on clinical efficacy between tianeptine and fluoxetine [OR=1.25, 95%CI(0.93,1.66), P=0.13]. The incidence of ADR in both group had significant difference [OR=0.53, 95%CI(0.36-0.77), P0.001]. CONCLUSION Tianeptine is as effective as fluoxetine for treatment of depression with fewer side effects. However, high quality and large-scale RCT are required for further study.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38