论预约合同  

Study on Pre- contract

作　　者：贾辰君[1] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学法学院,上海200092

出　　处：《常州大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第4期41-44,共4页Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2011BGL002)

摘　　要：预约合同在经济活动中广泛被采用,它并非附属合同,而是一种独立类型的合同。最高人民法院《关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》第2条首次正式承认了预约合同,这具有重要意义。预约合同的标的和传统合同相比有特殊性,预约合同的成立和生效要件应该符合《合同法》的规定。意向协议和预约合同在构成要件和法律拘束力方面差异很大。预约合同与本约合同之间是有界限的,要区分开来。预约合同的违约责任和其他合同的违约责任是一样的,不能陷入预约合同不能强制履行的误区。Pre - contract contract is widely used tract. Article 2 in Interpretations of the in the market economy, and the pre- contract is a separate con- People＇s Court on Issues Concerning the Application of Law for the Disputes over Sale and Purchase Contracts officially acknowledged the pre -contract for the first time, ant it is of great significance. The subject matter of pre - contract is fairly special compared to the tradi- tional contract, and its founded elements should comply with the requirement of Contract Law. Pre - contracts are different to letters of intention about the founded element and the force of law. There is difference between pre - contract and traditional contract, and it should be noticed. The obligation of violating pre - contract is distinct from traditional contract, and we should not misunderstand that the pre -contract is unfit for compulsory performance.

关 键 词：预约合同 本约合同 意向协议 强制缔约 

分 类 号：DF522[政治法律—民商法学]