受贿罪构成要素在司法中的扩张与虚置  

On the Bribery Charges with No Indictment

作　　者：孙国祥[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,南京210093

出　　处：《南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）》2015年第4期49-59,158,共11页Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(11YJA820062)

摘　　要：贿赂犯罪的研究一直是我国刑法理论界的热点,其视角既有宏观的刑事政策的研究,也有针对具体构成要素以及实践中具体疑难问题进行的研究。其中不少研究成果立足于实务操作,对贿赂犯罪的构成要素进行理论解读,或者提出立法性的建议,为受贿罪的司法和立法修正提供了理论依据。近年来,不断出台的受贿罪司法解释,严密了受贿犯罪的法网,契合了反腐败的现实需要,也导致了受贿罪的构成、概念发生了变化,一些法定要素得以扩张乃至处于被虚置的境地。基于不同的学理和视角,这些解释的合理性引起了争议,诸多解释首尾难顾,各种问题、矛盾以及漏洞依然存在,其执行力也就在争议中消解了。司法对构成要素的扩张与虚置不应成为立法偏颇的常态性因应之道,其累积成形的内容不但凸显了对受贿罪的罪状进行重构的必要性和紧迫性,而且也使立法修正具有了丰富的实践基础。Recent years have witnessed the issues of judicial interpretations in a succession,and more and more unlawful acts may lead to bribery charges.When tightening the legal system against corruption,these interpretations bring forth some modifications in the definition of bribery crime.Specifically,more unlawful acts have been included into the scope of bribery crime,but no indictment based on these charges has been made in reality,for those charges are based on different theories and understandings.Naturally,debates and disputes over the reasonableness and rationality of these judicial interpretations have been aroused.Due to the incoherence and even loopholes in those interpretations,their validity has been greatly dampened.This unfavorable situation should not be allowed to go any further in judicature,thus calling for the urgency and necessity for improvement.

关 键 词：受贿罪 司法解释 构成要素 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]