国外森林法立法经验及其对我国森林立法的启示  

Introduction of the Experience of Overseas Forestry Legislation and Its Inspiration to the Forestry Law in China

作　　者：裴丽萍[1] 张启彬[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学法学院,武汉430074

出　　处：《林业资源管理》2015年第4期172-178,共7页Forest Resources Management

基　　金：华中科技大学自主创新基金(人文社科)研究项目"森林可持续经营理念下的林权法律制度研究"的阶段性成果(2014AA015)

摘　　要：我国现行《森林法》更多地从行政管理的角度管制森林资源的分配,而林权制度改革更加注重保护权利人的财产权免受行政权力的束缚。这反映了我国森林立法一直以来陷入要么放权、要么集中的两难悖论的现实。事实上,在域外的森林资源的法律制度中,森林作为财产普遍建立了财产权;但区别于传统财产权,森林财产权是受到行政权力限制的。《关于加快推进生态文明建设的意见》中,修订森林法、健全森林产权制度和用途管理制度是完善生态文明建设制度体系的重要任务。通过借鉴国外立法经验,为建立我国的财产权与行政权协力的森林法律制度提供立法建议。The forestry law in action paid much more attention to the administrative mechanism on the governance of the distribution of forestry resources,which reflects the dilemma of devolution and concen-tration in forestry legislation in China.On the contrast,the reform of forest tenure concentrated on the dis-mantling of the administrative restriction on forest tenure.Actually,in the foreign forestry institutions,for-estry property has been reigning over the forest which has long been taken as property on one side,while on the other has been reined under the administrative power,which dramatically differs from traditional property rights.In the papers publicized recently-“the suggestion on the acceleration in promotion of the construction of ecological civilization”,the redaction of forestry law and melioration of forestry property and forestry management system have been assigned as priority in consummating the system of ecological civilization.Through comparative study,this research would beneficiate the legislation of forestry institu-tion in china,in which the property rights and administrative power cooperate efficiently.

关 键 词：森林财产权 财产权的限制 德国森林法 英美森林法 

分 类 号：D922.63[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]