检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹茂祥[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院台湾研究所
出 处:《台湾研究》2015年第4期43-51,共9页Taiwan Studies
摘 要:两岸分离几十年,期间经历了对峙、接触、交流发展的曲折历程,两岸敌对状态尚未正式结束,并以政治对立的形式延续至今。两岸执政当局在不同时期均宣称"正式结束两岸敌对状态,达成和平协议(协定)",但双方对和平协议的性质、内涵、路径等存在较大分歧。受制于岛内外诸多因素,马英九当局上台以来对此议题转趋消极,两岸欲开启政治商谈并达成和平协议短期内难以实现。在此过程中,两岸应预做准备、共同探讨,分阶段、分步骤、分重点,渐进确立包括和平协议在内的两岸关系和平稳定发展架构。The separation of the Taiwan Straits has continued for several decades. In this period, the both sides of the Taiwan Straits have experienced a tortuous process of confrontation, contact, communication and development. The state of hostility between the two sides has not been officially ended, and it still continues today in the form of political opposition. Both sides of the ruling authorities repeatedly called for " officially terminating the state of hostility between the two sides, and reaching a peace agreement" in different periods and different occasions, but, the two sides have big differences about the nature, connotation and path of the peace agreement. Restricted by the many factors inside and outside the island, the Ma Ying-jeou authorities has been more and more negative about this issue. It is difficult to open the political negotiations and sign a peace agreement in the short term. In the process, the two sides should prepare in advance and discuss, then gradually reach a stable and peaceful development framework of the Cross-Strait relations which the peace agreement is included.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.139.22