检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄烨[1]
出 处:《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第4期34-38,共5页Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:最高人民法院审判理论重大课题
摘 要:在我国现阶段,刑事司法领域不断暴露出来的一些令人震惊、使人震撼的冤假错案,挑战着司法的权威,冲击着人们的心理底线。为扭转此局面,重拾司法信心,对错案的责任人予以终身追责的制度应运而生。该制度具有追求公平正义、确保案件质量、回归司法规律、形成良好的法治氛围等积极的价值取向。但它与现有法律规定的诉讼时效以及法律的统一性之间存在着矛盾。应当适时修改追诉时效的规定,明确错案追诉的时效从错案的确定之日起计算,方可解决法律间的冲突与统一性问题。Nowadays, some Misjudged Cases are constantly challenging the judicial authority, attacking people's psycho- logical bottom line in the field of criminal justice. To reverse this situation and regain the confidence of Jurisdiction, the System for lifelong Responsibility has been bulit and developed rapidly. This system has the values of pursuing fairness and justice,en- suring the quality of the case,following judicial law, forming a favorable legal environment and other positive ones. But there is a contradiction between the unity and it in the present law. The provisions of Prosecution limitations should be modified proper- ly,making it clear that it should be calculated from the date the case is misjudged. Only in this way,the confliction and the unity can be resolved in the law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28