检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴珍峰[1]
出 处:《中国实用医药》2015年第22期27-28,共2页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死(心梗)患者猝死预警指标Tp-e/QT比值的临床价值。方法诊断为ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死的患者50例为研究组;对照组为同期50例来院进行健康体检的受试者。对比两组QTd、Tp-e及Tp-e/QT比值。结果研究组和对照组QTd、Tp-e及Tp-e/QT对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组中恶性心律失常者与非恶性心律失常者QTd、Tp-e分别为(58.5±3.9)、(158.7±32.6)ms和(58.8±4.2)、(162.3±33.4)ms,对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组中恶性心律失常者与非恶性心律失常者Tp-e/QT分别为(0.32±0.06)、(0.29±0.05),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论本次研究认为ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者Tp-e/QT比值明显增大,其是心脏猝死的较好预警指标。Objective To investigate clinical value of Tp-e/QT ratio as warning index for sudden death of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Methods Research group contained 50 diagnosed patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and control group contained 50 healthy people. QTd, Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio were compared between the two groups. Results There were statistically significant differences of QTd, Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio between the research group and the control group(P〈0.05). QTd and TP-e of malignant arrhythmia and non-malignant arrhythmia patients in the research group were respectively(58.5±3.9),(158.7±32.6)ms and(58.8±4.2),(162.3±33.4)ms. Their difference had no statistical significance(P〉0.05). Their Tp-e/QT were(0.32±0.06) and(0.29±0.05), and the difference had statistical significance(P〈0.05). Conclusion This study shows obviously increased Tp-e/QT ratio in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients, and this ratio is a good warning index for cardiac sudden death.
分 类 号:R542.22[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166