检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学中国WTO研究院 [2]对外经济贸易大学中国 WTO 研究院
出 处:《现代国际关系》2015年第8期29-35,64,共7页
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目(14AGJ012);“对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助”(CXTD4-08)支持
摘 要:多哈回合自2001年发起以来始终无法取得实质性突破,这种僵局的产生与多边贸易体制下权力格局的变化有很大关系,而这种变化的主要表现就是美国霸权的衰落。本文从苏珊·斯特兰奇的结构性权力视角出发,详细分析了多哈回合前后美国的结构性权力发生的变化,以及它对多哈回合产生的影响,进而指出美国霸权衰落后多边贸易体系权力安排的失衡是造成多哈回合困境的根本原因。No any substantive progress has been achieved in the Doha Round of WTO negotiations ever since it was launched in 2001. The deadlock of the multilateral trading negotiation has a lot to do with the change of the world's power structure,which is mainly manifested by the decline of the U.S hegemony. the authors analyze the transformation of the U.S. structural power before and after the launch of the Doha round and their analysis is based on the structural power theory put forward by Susan Strange. The paper also analyzes how such changes have affected the transformation of American structural power and its impacts on the Doha round. Based on these analyses,the authors conclude that point out that the unbalanced arrangement of power in the multilateral trade system after the US hegemony decline is the root cause of the deadlock in the Doha negotiations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15