检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李小换[1]
机构地区:[1]河南焦作市人民医院脑外科,广东河南454002
出 处:《广州医科大学学报》2015年第2期87-89,共3页Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical University
摘 要:目的:探讨循证护理在重症脑损伤气管切开患者肺部感染中的应用效果。方法:住院重症颅脑损伤气管切开患者70例随机分为研究组与对照组,各35例。分别给予基础护理、循证护理,比较术后肺部感染患病率、堵管时间及住院时间。结果:研究组堵管时间、住院时间及肺部感染率均明显降低(P<0.01)。结论:循证护理方法在重症脑损伤患者肺部感染中的应用可靠、有效,值得临床推广应用。Objective: To determine the efficiency of evidence-based nursing for pulmonary infection in patients with severe brain injury and subsequent tracheotomy. Methods: A total of 70 patients with severe craniocerebral injury and subsequent tracheotomy were randomly allocated to receive basic nursing( control group,n = 35) or evidence-based nursing( n = 35). The two groups were compared on postoperative pulmonary infections,time to obstruction of the tracheal cannula,and length of hospital stay. Results: The study group showed lower rate of postoperative pulmonary infections,longer time to obstruction of the tracheal cannula,and shorter length of hospital stay,compared with the control group( all P 〈0. 01). Conclusion: Evidence-based nursing in severe brain injury patients with pulmonary infection appears to be a reliable,effective approach which is worthy of widespread use in clinical practices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117