我国知识产权纠纷多元化解决机制研究  

On the Multiple Resolution Mechanism of Intellectual Property Dispute in China

作　　者：沈伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2015年第8期50-57,共8页Electronics Intellectual Property

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"专利无效判定之行政与司法的博弈研究"(13CFX090)

摘　　要：通过对近几年中美两国知识产权案件受理量进行比较,我国有必要建构一套完备的知识产权纠纷解决机制。缘于知识产权纠纷具有复杂化、市场化、当事人利益多元化、高度涉外化等特殊性,知识产权纠纷解决机制的运行现状表现多样,并存在单一诉讼机制彰显不足、行政救济空泛脱节、调解机制内在缺失等运行困境。因此,应以经济与效率、合作与共赢、兼顾市场利益与消费者利益为基本价值取向,不断发展和完善诉讼、仲裁、调解等多元机制,并着力协调各机制之间的相互衔接,完善相应保障促进机制,为知识产权纠纷当事人提供便捷、高效、多元的纠纷解决途径。Through comparing the amount of IPR cases accepted in China and United States in recent years, it is necessary to construct a complete set of IPR dispute resolution mechanism. Since the IPR dispute has special characteristics of complication, marketization, parties＇ interests＇ multiplication, highly foreign-related etc.. The current operation performance is various in the IPR dispute resolution mechanism, and there are many operational difficulties, such as the lack of a single litigation mechanism, the disconnect and vague of administrative relief, the intemal absence for mediation mechanism and so on. Therefore, we should take economic and efficiency, win-win cooperation and balance the interests of the market and consumers as basic value orientation. Ceaselessly develop and improve multiple mechanism including litigation, arbitration and mediation etc., and strive to coordinate various mechanisms between each other, improve the corresponding mechanism of security and promotion, provide convenient, efficient and multiple approaches of dispute resolution for the parties in IPR dispute.

关 键 词：知识产权纠纷 多元化解决机制 诉讼 调解 诉调对接 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学] D926[政治法律—法学]