检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晓晶[1] 杨改生[2] 杨继光[1] 张小光[1]
机构地区:[1]河北北方学院研究生部,张家口075000 [2]空军总医院麻醉科,北京100142
出 处:《医药导报》2015年第9期1177-1180,共4页Herald of Medicine
基 金:首都市民健康项目培育基金资助项目(Z141100002114010)
摘 要:目的探讨以脑电双频指数(BIS)为反馈控制变量的丙泊酚闭环靶控输注系统复合瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性。方法择期行腹腔镜胆囊切除手术患者40例,按照随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组各20例,治疗组采用闭环靶控,设置反馈值为BIS45~55;对照组采用开环靶控,诱导时丙泊酚血浆靶控浓度设定为4μg·mL^-1,麻醉维持时丙泊酚血浆靶控浓度设定为2~5μg·mL^-1(根据BIS反馈值45~55人工调整)。诱导时两组瑞芬太尼以4ng·mL^-1靶控输注,麻醉维持时根据手术中情况调整瑞芬太尼用量。记录两组在诱导前(t0)、靶控输注BIS值为50时(t1)、插管时(t2)、切皮时(t3)、手术开始5min(t4)、切除胆囊时(t5)、缝皮时(t6)的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、BIS变化、诱导时间及丙泊酚用量。结果对照组在t1、t3、t4、t5等时间点MAP较治疗组均明显下降(均P〈0.05);t5时间点HR变化较大(P〈0.05)。治疗组和对照组在t2时间点丙泊酚用量分别为(110.10±8.34),(120.55±6.26)mg:在t5时间点丙泊酚用量分别为(603.20±116.55),(759.50±116.37)mg(均P〈0.05)。结论以BIS为反馈值.丙泊酚闭环靶控输注复合瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉用于腹腔镜胆囊切除手术,手术中患者麻醉深度易于维持,血流动力学稳定.丙泊酚用量明显减少。Objective To evaluate the feasibility of propofol infusion by a closed-loop system for the titration of anaesthetic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy guided by Bispectral Index( BIS). Methods Forty patients subjected to laparoscopic cholecystectomy randomly allocated into two groups: the control group with opened-loop titratioin of propofol TCI induced at a target of 4 μg·m L-1and aintained from 2 to 5 μg·m L-1and the treatment group with closed-loop titration was performed using a proportional differential algorithm.For both groups,the BIS was set at 45-55.Remifentanil TCI was infused at a target of 4 ng·m L-1and was maintained according to the situation. The change in medial arterial pressure( MAP),heart rate( HR) and BIS were recorded before anesthesia( t0),target BIS of 50( t1),at tracheal intubation( t2),during incision of skin( t3),5 min after the operation( t4),at t5 of gallbladder removing and at t6 of skin suturing.The dose of propofol was calculated.Results Haemodynamic data were similar between groups during the induction.But MAP was decreased significantly at t1,t3,t4,t5 in the control compared with the treatment group( P<0.05).HR changes a lot at t5 in the control compared with the treatment( P<0.05).Total dose of propofol in the treatment group was statistically lower than that in the controls[( 110.10± 8.34) vs( 120.55±6.26) mg;( 603.20±116.55) vs( 759.50±116.37) mg,P<0.05) ]. Conclusion Automated titration guided by BIS for propofol infusion is feasible without increase in haemodynamic adverse effects and is of less propofol consumption in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15