历史性权利、国际法与主权诉求--韩国学者论独岛／竹岛争端  

Historical Right, International Law and Claim of Sovereignty---- Arguments of the South Korean Scholars on the Dispute over Dokdo/Takeshima

作　　者：李峰[1] 郑先武[1,2] 宋文志[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学国际关系研究院 [2]南京大学中国南海研究协同创新中心

出　　处：《和平与发展》2015年第4期42-61,116-117,共20页Peace and Development

摘　　要：国际法是海洋领土声索的主要依据,历史性权利在海洋法中的地位虽模糊,但也是我国主权声索的重要倚靠。文章通过对韩国有关独岛争端的新近文献的梳理,在国际关系视阈内,以历史性权利为史实分析切入点,推动其与国际法契合。韩国学者基于正史的历史性权利分析显示了韩国长期拥有并捍卫着独岛的主权;还通过引用国际法目的解释原则,解释了《旧金山对日和约》对独岛归属的界定;批判1905年日本吞并独岛的非法性则是将历史性权利融入国际法的典型,这对于我国研究与因应岛屿争端具有借鉴价值。The international law is the major basis of marine territorial claims. Although the position of historical right is rather vague in the law of the sea, it is our chief argument for sovereign claims. This paper, through studying the recent publications of the South Korean scholars on the dispute over Dokdo, has taken the historical right as the breakthrough point in the analysis of historical facts from the perspective of international relations, and tried to bring it in line with the international law. The South Korean scholars, relying on the analysis of the historical right in official history, have shown the fact that South Korea has long had and defended its sovereign right over Dokdo; have interpreted the definition in the San Francisco Treaty of Peace with Japan of the ownership of Dokdo by referring to the principle of objective explanation in the international law; and claimed that criticizing Japan's illegal annexation of Dokdo in 1905 is an example to merge historical right with international law, which offers a good reference for us to study and deal with disputes over islands.

关 键 词：独岛争端 韩国研究 历史性权利 国际法 

分 类 号：D993.5[政治法律—国际法学]